A New Threat to the President's Agenda: The Tax Cut Democrats are indeed gasping. They are already warning that Congress will face painful tradeoffs when it returns from its summer recess next month and begins wrangling in earnest with Mr. Bush over next year's spending bills and the array of policy choices within them. But Mr. Bush cannot breathe freely, either. Just two months after he signed it into law, the tax cut that once seemed an unalloyed triumph now threatens to complicate the rest of his agenda and expose him to political peril. From his plans for modernizing the military and developing a national missile defense to his aspirations of becoming the education president and tackling long-term issues like Social Security, Mr. Bush might have trouble paying the tab. At the same time, he has left himself open to accusations from Democrats that the tax cut will plunge the government back into budget deficits of a sort. The buffer left in the surplus following his tax cut appears to be eroding rapidly because of the flagging economy. Both Congress and the White House will update their surplus projections by the end of the month. It is possible the new figures will show the budget in the current fiscal year dipping into money that Democrats and most Republicans had considered off limits � the excess revenues being generated by Medicare. Raiding Medicare, as the Democrats put it, would be a tricky enough charge for the White House to deal with. But it could get worse. Within a year or two, the government may again start spending the Social Security surplus, breaching a bulwark against fiscal irresponsibility agreed to by both parties and the administration. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/weekinreview/12STEV.html

Data Permanently Erased From Florida Computers The examination, paid for by a group of news organizations including The New York Times, also found that some information had probably been permanently erased earlier this year after new operating systems were installed on three of the four computers, experts from Ontrack Data International Inc., a firm based in Minneapolis, said yesterday. While finding "bits and pieces" of hundreds of partly deleted files, they said there was no way to know the full extent of the destruction. But they also said they had found no evidence that records had been systematically purged as part of an intentional effort to destroy election documents. "If somebody did that, then it was a pretty poor attempt to cover their tracks," said Mike Rands, manager of operations for DataTrail, a division of Ontrack Data that specializes in data recovery and forensic computer examinations. Indeed, the company's examination unearthed dozens of election- related documents that had never been released by Ms. Harris's office. Among other things, the examination showed that Ms. Harris's lawyers and aides used the machines to send and retrieve e-mail messages, conduct legal research via the Internet, prepare Ms. Harris for potential questions from reporters and even to hunt for snappy quotations for her speeches. For months, Ms. Harris's lawyers have insisted that the computers had been used solely to write news releases. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/08/politics/08FLOR.htm

Reform and an Evolving Electorate Although we don't like to acknowledge it, there have always been strong antidemocratic forces in the United States. Large numbers of Americans, throughout our history, have not believed in universal suffrage and have acted accordingly. Their presence delayed the achievement of a fully enfranchised population until roughly 1970 and produced many episodes in which the right to vote contracted. The most extreme and well-known examples involve African-Americans in the South who were deprived of their constitutionally protected right to vote for more than 70 years. But antidemocratic Southerners have had plenty of company, and not just in the early days of the republic when voting was limited to men of property. National women's suffrage was not finally adopted until 1920. Rhode Island imposed a property qualification on all foreign-born citizens for much of the 19th century; California went to great lengths to prevent Asians from voting; New York adopted an English language literacy test in 1921 that was still disfranchising hundreds of thousands of people in the 1960's. In the 1930's, an organization headed by George Wickersham, a former United States attorney general, actively sought to disfranchise unemployed workers who were receiving federal relief. The resistance to democracy affected voting procedures as well as the right to vote itself; indeed, the erection of procedural obstacles to voting was often a strategic response to the formal enfranchisement of people considered undesirable. The registration systems that emerged in the late 19th century, for example, were not simply good government reforms designed to eliminate corruption (which is how the Carter-Ford commission describes them); they were also efforts to keep immigrants and the poor from voting by interposing layers of paperwork and deadlines between potential voters and the ballot box. The decline in turnout in American elections, which began at the end of the 19th century, was not an accident or the symptom of a mysterious malady. Both in the North and in the South, turnout was reduced, in good part, by laws designed to keep citizens from the polls and to prevent popular dissident parties from effectively contesting elections. Alabama's disfranchisement of men convicted of crimes like vagrancy and adultery � even after time had been served � was expressly crafted at the turn of the century to limit black participation in politics. (Similar laws limit black Alabaman voting today. Such permanent disfranchisement would be eliminated by the Carter-Ford recommendations.) In 1907, Pittsburgh's newly created voter registration board crowed about the "good results obtained" under a recently passed Pennsylvania registration law: in two years, the number of registrants was nearly halved. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/05/opinion/05KEYS.html

Is There No Choice? But the Israeli government view ignores facts that loom large among Palestinians. Israel has repeatedly failed to carry out promises and negotiated agreements � to make further redeployments from occupied territory, for example. Israel has made a two-state solution to the conflict less and less attractive by continuously building and enlarging settlements on land that would be part of the Palestinian state. The Palestinian view at the time of the Camp David conference last year was well described in The New York Review of Books by Robert Malley, a special assistant to President Clinton who was at Camp David, and Hussein Agha. "Seen from Gaza and the West Bank," they wrote, "Oslo's legacy read like a litany of promises deferred or unfulfilled. Six years after the agreement, there were more Israeli settlements, less freedom of movement and worse economic conditions. Powerful Palestinian constituencies � the intellectuals, security establishment, media, business community . . . � whose support was vital for any peace effort were disillusioned . . ., doubtful of Israel's willingness to implement signed agreements." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/04/opinion/04LEWI.html?todaysheadlines

Senate Republicans Boycott Vote on Election Reform "The message is unfortunate. This ought not be a partisan issue. There ought to be discussions on both sides.'' McConnell is angry that Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who chairs the committee, is pushing through his own election overhaul bill. McConnell wanted the committee also to consider a bill he and several other senators prepared. Dodd's bill would provide $3.5 billion to help states adopt uniform standards for voting machines by 2004. It would also take steps to improve voter education and ensure that people who are properly registered aren't deprived of the right to vote. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., has prepared a House version. Thursday's session "mocks the bipartisan promise of election reform,'' McConnell said in a letter to Dodd. Dodd said he was saddened by McConnell's comments. He said he asked McConnell in November, when Republicans still controlled the Senate, to work with him on an election reform bill. ``I never did receive a reply,'' Dodd said in a letter to McConnell Wednesday. Thursday, Dodd said Republicans could have come to the hearing and tried to offer amendments. "The idea that you do not show up to a vote is not exactly what I call a good civics lesson,'' Dodd said. Congress is considering election improvements to avoid problems such as those that plagued last fall's presidential elections. President Bush was declared the winner over Al Gore 36 days after the voting, enabled by a 5-4 Supreme Court decision that effectively halted a partial recount in Florida. "You get the impression they (Democrats) sort of want to stick their thumb in President Bush's eye,'' McConnell said Wednesday. Just Tuesday, a commission chaired by former Presidents Ford and Carter offered a number of broad changes to improve the nation's voting system. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/politics/AP-Electoral-Changes.htm

Oregon Democrats Seek to Oust Justices The Oregon Democratic Party endorsed a drive today to impeach five United States Supreme Court justices for the decision that effectively gave George W. Bush the presidency last year. The party's central committee voted overwhelmingly to begin a campaign it hoped would take the issue to the House of Representatives, which has the authority to impeach justices. The resolution passed today by Oregon party leaders called for the "immediate investigation of the behavior" of the five justices who voted to stop hand recounts of Florida ballots. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/23/politics/23OREG.html

Figures About Recent Global Summits Facts, figures about recent global summits: Genoa, Italy: Summit of wealthy industrial nations, July 2001 --One protester killed. --About 500 people injured. --Nearly 180 arrested. --About 20,000 police officers, paramilitary police and soldiers deployed. --Cost: about $145 million, including $25 million for security and $120 million for refurbishing the city. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Summits-Numbers-Box.html

Hamas Threatens Suicide Bombers After Child's Death The militant Islamic group Hamas threatened to unleash 10 suicide bombers against Israel in revenge for the killing of an 11-year-old Palestinian boy who was buried in the Gaza Strip on Sunday. ``There are 10 martyrs waiting inside Israel. They are ready at any moment to get revenge on the Israeli killers,'' shouted members of Hamas's military wing during Khalil Mughrabi's funeral. He was killed by Israeli troops on Saturday. ``If the Israelis have big bombs, we have human bombs,'' they chanted through loudspeakers during the funeral at Rafah, along Gaza's border with Egypt, near where the child was shot dead. Mughrabi became the 17th Palestinian killed since a cease-fire drawn up by U.S. CIA Director George Tenet was supposed to have taken effect on June 13. Nine Israelis have also been killed since the truce was brokered. http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-mideast.html

Arafat Criticizes U.S., Saying It Should Do More As evidence of what he contends is his "100 percent effort" to clamp down on terrorism, Mr. Arafat pulled from his jacket pocket, which seemed to contain a wealth of documents, a typed report in Arabic from the Palestinian intelligence service. The report, he said, held detailed information that was provided to the Israelis a day after the June 1 suicide bombing outside a Tel Aviv discoth�que that killed 21 young people. It said the Palestinians had learned that the man who drove the suicide bomber to the beachside disco was a longtime informant for Israeli intelligence, Mr. Arafat said, a Palestinian who had been granted Israeli citizenship and resettled in Israel like many "collaborators." The bomber himself was a Palestinian with a Jordanian passport. Mr. Arafat appeared to be trying to make the point that the Tel Aviv bomber and his driver had no connection to the Palestinian Authority while they had at least indirect links with Israel. He also made reference to another deadly terrorist attack, years ago, in which he said Palestinian collaborators also played a key role. Asked to spell out what he was suggesting, he said, "I'm giving you facts and leaving it for everyone to arrive to realities." Nabil Shaath, a senior minister who has objected repeatedly to Israeli demands for a Palestinian roundup of Islamist militants, added, "At the very least, this means that looking for the usual suspects will not work in these cases." Ahttp://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/08/world/08ARAF.html?pagewanted=all

The E.E.O.C. Is Short of Will and Cash Throughout corporate America, complaints of discrimination and harassment remain stubbornly high, despite the decade-long economic boom that forced many employers to scramble for workers. Some 80,000 individual complaints are made annually to the commission, a number that has held steady in recent years. A growing proportion are accusations of harassment of women and minorities: factory floors where some men feel free to expose themselves and work places where supervisors don Ku Klux Klan hoods or fellow employees hang nooses. Claims of retaliation by employers against workers who have complained of discrimination have nearly tripled in the last decade, to about 22,000 a year. "There are thousands of establishments that appear to be discriminating," said Alfred W. Blumrosen, a professor at the Rutgers School of Law in Newark, who was an official at the agency in its early years and has maintained ties there. With a Ford Foundation grant, Mr. Blumrosen is analyzing the agency's own data, without identifying specific companies, to determine the breadth of discrimination in the United States. He plans to release his results this fall. Through much of its history, the E.E.O.C. has been plagued by a lack of resources and a combination of internal politics and inefficiencies that have prevented it from accomplishing much more than isolated victories. While it has recently taken stands on some controversial issues � it has sought to prohibit employers from using genetic testing on employees and to force companies to cover the cost of prescription contraceptives � its critics say it is too cognizant of how the political winds are blowing to pursue its mission aggressively. "There is not a huge national will to have the agency be more effective," said John Rowe, a district office director in Chicago who has worked for the E.E.O.C. for nearly 30 years. "It shows itself not only in the want of resources and want of political appetite for radical change but also down in the trenches. It's unwise to upset anybody too much." http://partners.nytimes.com/2001/07/01/business/01EEOC.html?pagewanted=all

U.S. Report Finds Flaws in Study of California Power Companies An investigative arm of Congress faulted federal regulators today for claiming that there was no evidence to support accusations that power companies manipulated California's electricity market. The General Accounting Office reviewed a study by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued in February. The energy agency found no evidence that companies withheld power to drive up prices. Politicians in California and some economists have been asserting for months that power companies withheld available electrical generating capacity to create or worsen shortages. Generating companies had cited the energy agency's report to rebut those accusations. The accounting office said the agency's work looked only at physical reasons for outages and did not explore the possibility that generating companies used bidding strategies to withhold supplies. Moreover, the office found that the study did not prove that cutoffs had occurred for unavoidable physical reasons. "FERC's study was not thorough enough to support its overall conclusion that audited companies were not physically withholding electricity supply to influence prices," the accounting office said. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/30/national/30POWE.html?pagewanted=all

Senators Hear Bitter Words on Florida Vote One of the dissenting members, Abigail Thernstrom, presented her rebuttal to the report today. Relying on a statistical analysis by John Lott, an economist at Yale Law School, Ms. Thernstrom said that "voter error was the central problem in Florida, not disenfranchisement" and that the committee report was flawed and prejudicial. "One of the dissenting members, Abigail Thernstrom, presented her rebuttal to the report today. Relying on a statistical analysis by John Lott, an economist at Yale Law School, Ms. Thernstrom said that "voter error was the central problem in Florida, not disenfranchisement" and that the committee report was flawed and prejudicial. In another tense exchange, Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, took on the credibility of Mr. Lott, Ms. Thernstrom's statistician. Mr. Schumer, a proponent of gun control, first belittled Mr. Lott in passing as the person who had found, in Mr. Schumer's words, "The more guns, the less violence." In prosecutorial tones, Mr. Schumer then wrung out of Mr. Lott a defeated "yeah" to the question of whether "a greater percentage of black and Hispanic people are turned away than, or don't get to vote, than white people?" The packed hearing room broke into applause at Mr. Lott's concession, prompting Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, to gavel the room to order, saying, "It's not a rally; it's a hearing." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/28/politics/28VOTE.html

Senators Hear Bitter Words on Florida Vote Ms. Berry affirmed the findings of the report and said she was "surprised that people are so exercised" about it. She said it was clear that black voters had higher rates of problems than others, regardless of whether they were intentional. "If I ran over you at 90 miles an hour and killed you, it doesn't matter whether I intended to or not, I still killed you," Ms. Berry said. http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

2 Judges Do Battle in an Immigration Case �something extraordinary has happened in the case of a 46-year-old man from Trinidad, detained since last summer in a county jail here, whose wife seeks such a visa for him. First an immigration judge here, William Van Wyke, suspended an effort by the Immigration and Naturalization Service to deport the man, and pressured officials to act quickly on the visa application. Then, in an even more unusual twist, Judge Van Wyke's decision was overruled by the nation's chief immigration judge, Michael J. Creppy, after what Judge Van Wyke and his supporters call a series of improper contacts between I.N.S. lawyers and Judge Creppy's office. The reversal, and Judge Van Wyke's denunciation of his boss, are the talk of the immigration circuit, whose union of administrative judges has filed a formal protest against Judge Creppy and a top aide, accusing them of unethical behavior. "The actions of the office of the chief immigration judge raise profoundly troubling questions about the integrity of the deportation process and the independence of the chief immigration judge from the I.N.S.," said Lucas Guttentag, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's immigrants' rights project. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/21/national/21JUDG.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all

How Do You Consider Someone Spending Decades In Prison, Sentenced to Death, Then Released Minus Years of His Life Proof That the System Is Working?

Death Penalty Falls From Favor as Some Lose Confidence in Its Fairness Some said that what persuaded them was the news that 13 prisoners on death row in Illinois were discovered to be innocent � a revelation that led Gov. George Ryan, a Republican, to declare a statewide moratorium on the death penalty last year. Others said they were troubled by reports that the death penalty may be disproportionately imposed on blacks and Hispanics. "I've slowly been changing my mind about the death penalty," said Fredrica Hicks, a mother of three who works in a Social Security office in Chicago, where the exonerations of prisoners in her state gave her pause. "What would happen if something went wrong and someone accused me of something and there was no way for me to prove my innocence, or evidence was lost and I was sitting on death row? If it has happened to someone else, it could happen to anyone. It could be me." But Charlotte Stout, a retired nurse in Greenfield, Tenn., rebutted that, saying: "To me, that is the system working. If it hadn't been working, the innocent people wouldn't have been released." "Today to be raising questions about capital punishment is to be in the company of the pope, Governor Ryan, the Legislatures of Nebraska and New Hampshire, the columnist George Will, Pat Robertson and William Sessions, the former director of the F.B.I., all of whom have come out in favor of a moratorium, said Mr. Sarat, the author of "When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition" (Princeton University Press, 2001). "Go down to the police department and look at the police blotter and you'll be convinced it's not deterring anything," said Jerry Jones, an election worker in Chicago. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/17/national/17VOIC.html?pagewanted=all

China Said to Sharply Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions In the debate on global climate change it has long been a given that China, with its huge population and endless coal reserves, would overtake the United States early this century as the biggest source of the atmospheric pollution that scientists believe is warming the planet. That specter of runaway Chinese emissions has been cited by President Bush as a major reason for describing as "fatally flawed" the 1997 Kyoto agreement to protect the climate. The treaty exempts developing countries, including China, from its initial, binding limits on the output of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases that scientists believe are causing traumatic changes in the climate. But treaty obligation or not, China has already achieved a dramatic slowing in its emissions of carbon dioxide in the last decade, Chinese and Western energy experts say. That record of progress has pushed further into the horizon the day that China will surpass the United States as the lead culprit, and it is something that Mr. Bush seems to have overlooked in his harsh appraisal. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/15/world/15CHIN.html?pagewanted=all

A Skeptical Europe Awaits Bush on 5-Day Trip It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle," began an opinion piece in the conservative daily ABC, "than for a rich man to be executed in the United States." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/11/world/11EURO.html

The Backslap Backlash The political incompetence that led to Mr. Jeffords's defection hardly squares with the prevailing Beltway view of the Bush White House during its first 100 days. That view, as usual, is best articulated by Washington's Dean, the pundit David Broder, who in February gave the new administration high grades for having "a cabinet of C.E.O.'s, made up mainly of men and women who have run large enterprises." But of course it's exactly the C.E.O.-itis exemplified by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul O'Neill that led the administration to be blindsided, taking the Jeffords rebellion seriously only days after it had been reported by such obscure news outlets as CNN. As one veteran of past administrations and the corporate world puts it: "C.E.O.'s are used to flying their own planes, seeing only their own subordinates and being accountable to no one. They are profoundly certain of their own value system. They have contempt for the public and the press. They have none of the accountability required of a president of the United States." Such arrogance is the real story of this White House thus far. The administration proceeds on the belief that no one would possibly question its wisdom and that anything can be sold with the proper marketing strategy and enough repetition of an unvarying script. If the president is known for "reaching out" and "building bridges," as we're constantly told, it must be so, even if the Jeffords fiasco proves it wildly false. If he says it's possible to have a huge tax cut while building a missile shield and without dipping into the Social Security and Medicare piggy banks, it must be so, even if the numbers don't remotely add up. So goes this cognitive-dissonance presidency. Perhaps it's the ease with which the White House walked over the Democrats on the way to the tax cut that has accelerated this brand of subterfuge. These days, with impressive brazenness, almost every Bush photo op belies what his administration is actually up to. � In a five-day period the president appeared at two national parks, Sequoia and the Everglades, dressed in more earth tones than Al Gore at his most craven. The message, of course, is that Mr. Bush likes hugging trees almost as much as he does African-American schoolchildren. But in fact his environmental record remains unchanged. He shows no signs of opposing drilling off Florida's Gulf Coast (though even his brother is against it) or of opposing the development of a commercial airport not far from the Everglades' border. The National Parks Conservation Association gives his record a D thus far, noting that his modest increase in the parks budget is more for buildings and roads than for preserving nature. � In his commencement address at Notre Dame, among other religious venues, Mr. Bush has repeatedly praised the power of faith-based charities. But according to The Washington Post, the administration very quietly stopped pushing its promised boon to charities in the tax bill: a deduction for charitable contributions for those taxpayers who don't itemize on their returns. Not only did the White House let that provision die to preserve its main goal, a top-heavy reduction of tax rates, but in fighting for an end to the estate tax it has also eliminated an added incentive for the wealthy to donate to charity. � In Philadelphia in mid-May, Mr. Bush posed in front of a sea of police officers to push a plan to hire more prosecutors to enforce existing gun laws. But three days later Attorney General John Ashcroft wrote a letter to the National Rifle Association endorsing an interpretation of the Second Amendment that could in fact gut existing gun laws. Some of those cops standing behind the president may also be gutted, for in its budget the administration has asked for a 17 percent decrease in COPS, the federal program that provides money for police salaries. � Mr. Bush has repeatedly visited various Boys and Girls Clubs, touting them as an example of how the government can "facilitate programs" for kids and promote "the universal concept of loving a neighbor." In his budget, federal money for Boys and Girls Clubs is eliminated entirely. Even the first lady has been enlisted in these bait-and-switch shenanigans. Laura Bush appeared at a Washington public library in April to kick off "the Campaign for America's Libraries" � just one week before her husband's budget cut the federal outlay for libraries by $39 million. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/09/opinion/09RICH.html?pagewanted=all

Floyd Norris: Bush's Tax Shuffle The alternative tax is supposed to hit the rich. It forces taxpayers with substantial deductions to compute their tax bill twice. First they do it the regular way, and then they calculate it again, and apply a lower tax rate, without being able to take advantage of a substantial number of exemptions. Then, they pay whichever tax is higher. The new tax law promises higher deductions late in this decade. Married couples will get a bigger deduction, and higher-income taxpayers will get a larger standard deduction. But those deductions don't count for the alternative tax. Tens of millions of taxpayers will see their savings largely vanish after the alternative tax kicks in. The tax-bill writers understood this, and even threw in a provision to reduce the impact � up until the next presidential election. As a result, the official estimate is that the number of taxpayers paying the alternative minimum tax in 2004 will be 5.3 million, up from 1.4 million this year but fewer than the 5.6 million who would have paid it under the old law. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/01/business/01NORR.html?pagewanted=all

Jeffords Defects, Forcing Shift in Agenda Later in an interview he said the critical issue that led to his defection was education, specifically the decision by Senate leaders and the White House to drop $300 billion in school spending from the final budget resolution. "When they took that all out," he said, "that was it." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/25/politics/25CHAN.html?pagewanted=all

While a Restless Senator Stirred, the Bush Team May Have Slept The strategist said that when Mr. Jeffords refused to give White House officials unconditional love, they responded in a fashion that left him feeling "constantly dissed, ignored, embarrassed, not treated with the kind of respect you would accord a senator, let alone a Republican." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/24/politics/24BUSH.html?pagewanted=all

Nuclear Power Gains in Status After Lobbying In mid-March, a cadre of seven nuclear power executives sought and won an hourlong meeting in the White House with Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's top political adviser. Also attending were Lawrence B. Lindsey, the president's top economic adviser, Andrew Lundquist, the executive director of Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force, and others involved in devising the energy plan. "We said, Look, we are an important player on this energy team and here are our vital statistics, and we think that you should start talking about nuclear when you talk about increasing the nation's supply," Christian H. Poindexter, chairman of the Constellation Energy Group, recalled today. And then a surprising thing happened. "It was shortly after that, as a matter of fact I think the next night, when the vice president was being interviewed on television, he began to talk about nuclear power for the first time," Mr. Poindexter said. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/23/politics/23NUKE.html?pagewanted=all

Con�cept The Standard: Don't Know Much About a Science Book

Con�cept When a Test Fails the Schools, Careers and Reputations Suffer

Right Answer, Wrong Score: Test Flaws Take Toll One day last May, a few weeks before commencement, Jake Plumley was pulled out of the classroom at Harding High School in St. Paul and told to report to his guidance counselor. The counselor closed the door and asked him to sit down. The news was grim. Jake, a senior, had failed a standardized test required for graduation. To try to salvage his diploma, he had to give up a promising job and go to summer school. "It changed my whole life, that test," Jake recalled. In fact, Jake should have been elated. He actually had passed the test. But the company that scored it had made an error, giving Jake and 47,000 other Minnesota students lower scores than they deserved. But it was not an isolated incident. The testing industry is coming off its three most problem-plagued years. Its missteps have affected millions of students who took standardized proficiency tests in at least 20 states. An examination of recent mistakes and interviews with more than 120 people involved in the testing process suggest that the industry cannot guarantee the kind of error-free, high-speed testing that parents, educators and politicians seem to take for granted. In recent years, the four testing companies that dominate the market have experienced serious breakdowns in quality control. Problems at NCS, for example, extend beyond Minnesota. In the last three years, the company produced a flawed answer key that incorrectly lowered multiple-choice scores for 12,000 Arizona students, erred in adding up scores of essay tests for students in Michigan and was forced with another company to rescore 204,000 essay tests in Washington because the state found the scores too generous. NCS also missed important deadlines for delivering test results in Florida and California. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/20/business/20EXAM.html?pagewanted=all

25 Years Later, Rumsfeld's Dream Is Alive Again In his first three months on the job, American warplanes bombed Iraq, a Navy submarine sank a Japanese fishing boat, killing nine people aboard, and 24 Americans were detained in China after their Navy spy plane collided with a Chinese fighter jet. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/18/world/18MILI.html?pagewanted=all

The Details: Excessive Regulation Is Blamed for Energy Woes The 170-page policy paper devotes the bulk of its text, which reads in parts like a nonpolitical academic study, to examining how to reduce energy demand and cultivate clean sources of energy like wind and biomass, as agricultural, human and animal waste are known. The administration has emphasized that of its 105 specific recommendations, highlighted throughout the text with blue stars, 42 deal with conservation, efficiency and renewable energy sources, while only 35 address supplies of traditional energy sources. But the report's priorities are evident from the start. The first chart in the report, which illustrates how energy consumption is outpacing production, uses a mix of government statistics to make the future shortfall in production seem more acute than it might turn out to be. Among the many regulations it has vowed to review, streamline, expedite or eliminate are land-use restrictions in the Rocky Mountains, lease stipulations for off-shore and coastal zones where oil and gas are plentiful and environmental reviews required when utilities want to retool power plants or oil companies want to expand refineries. Thttp://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/18/politics/18ENER.html?pagewanted=all

News Analysis: A New Focus on Supply Under federal law, anyone wanting to drill oil wells, lay pipelines or build power plants has for decades been required to prepare an environmental impact statement clearing the project on environmental grounds. Now, as a central part of his new energy plan, President Bush is calling for attention to the flip side of that approach. Under an executive order that Mr. Bush is to issue on Friday, any federal agency considering steps that might adversely affect the nation's energy health would have to issue a new kind of impact statement, this one on energy grounds. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/18/politics/18ENVI.html?pagewanted=all

Education: Government Internet Subsidy Stretched to Its Limits "The point of the program is to make things more affordable," Hershman said. "There's been more demand than they thought there would be. There are still very poor schools that haven't been able to make the cut off." With help from e-rate discounts, 98 percent of U.S. public schools now have Internet connections, according to new statistics issued this month by the Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics. But only 77 percent of instructional classrooms have Internet connections, and the number drops to 60 percent for schools with the highest concentrations of poverty. Despite continued demand for education technology funding, lawmakers and advocates for the e-rate are not clamoring for more money, nor are the telephone companies that have been contributing to the fund offering to ante up more. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/15/technology/16EDUCATION.html?pagewanted=all

Lott Rebuked for Delaying Campaign Finance Bill Senator John McCain pushed through the Senate a rebuke of the Republican leader today for acting to "thwart the will of the majority" by failing to send to the House the overhaul of the campaign finance law that was handily approved by the Senate last month. The resolution, which was attached as an amendment to education legislation, did not mention Senator Trent Lott, the majority leader from Mississippi. Because the education bill is still being debated, the resolution has no immediate effect. But Mr. McCain made quite clear in debate that it was directed straight at Mr. Lott and was a repudiation of his quiet delay of campaign finance legislation. "What we are seeing here is a minority of one stopping the will of this body," Mr. McCain said. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/16/politics/16DONA.html?pagewanted=all

Bush Task Force on Energy Worked in Mysterious Ways

"It's an incredible insult to the consumers of this country that, to the best of my knowledge, none of the consumer organizations were invited to the meetings or otherwise participated."

Among those who said they felt shut out was the Consumer Federation of America, the nation's largest consumer-advocacy group. Howard Metzenbaum, a Democrat and former senator from Ohio who is now chairman of the group, said, "The energy crisis is first and foremost a price crisis affecting consumers." Juleanna Glover Weiss, Mr. Cheney's spokeswoman, said no invitations were issued and groups had to request meetings. "We didn't invite anybody to meet with us," she said. The leaders of about two dozen environmental groups had asked to see Mr. Cheney, whose office turned down their requests. Instead, midlevel staff members from the groups met with Mr. Lundquist and Ms. Knutson. Alys Campaigne, legislative director of the National Resources Defense Council, said that that meeting lasted about 40 minutes but that the size of the group inhibited substantive policy discussion. "We asked who the deputies were on different issues so we could have more in-depth conversations, and they wouldn't tell us," she said. "They said, `Just send us paper, we'll take a look at it.' The meeting felt like window dressing for us, but they got to check off the box that they consulted with stake-holders." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/16/politics/16LOBB.html?pagewanted=all

The Fine Print: Senate Tax Bill Isn't All That It Seems Under the tax bill the Senate Finance Committee will take up on Tuesday, the federal estate tax would be repealed in 2011. Yet most people with estates large enough to owe taxes before the repeal date would owe more in taxes after the repeal. That is one of several anomalies in a bill that was jury-rigged to include all the different tax cuts President Bush campaigned for, more tax relief for low- and moderate-income taxpayers than the president proposed and a total cost of no more than the $1.35 trillion over 11 years that Congress allotted in the budget plan adopted last week. Another oddity relates to how the bill would increase the amount of income exempt from the alternative minimum tax. The purpose is to make sure that millions more people do not have to pay this alternative tax and thus be worse off than they would have been without the bill's cut in income-tax rates. But the increased exemption would only be in effect from 2002 through 2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/15/politics/15TAX.html?pagewanted=all

Far From Dead, Subsidies Fuel Big Farms Surveying the farm that he carved out in the Panhandle landscape of dry mesquite and sagebrush, Mr. Bezner says the key to his family's prosperity is federal farm subsidies. "We're successful primarily because of government help," said Mr. Bezner, 59, an entomologist who grew up on a farm outside Amarillo. Although Mr. Bezner hesitated to discuss the size of those subsidies (and refused to divulge how much he makes without federal help, or what his expenses are), government documents show that in the last four years of the 1990's, he received $1.38 million in direct federal payments. Most remarkably, Mr. Bezner and the other big farmers here in Hartley County and across the country received those record-breaking payments in an era when farm subsidies were slated for extinction. Far From Dead, Subsidies Fuel Big Farms

White House Is Denying Pulling In Welcome Mat "Up until this administration, we normally got 8 to 10 busloads of tourists into the White House four, five times a week," Mr. Patterson said. "Now we're lucky if we get one in once a week. Today we needed 80 tickets; we got 10. I got drivers who have been here 30, 35 years and all they talk about is how the White House is letting fewer people in. It's just not right; we are the people and that is our house." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/13/politics/13TOUR.html?pagewanted=all

Blacks and Hispanics in House Balk on Campaign Finance Bill Many blacks in Florida complained that they were prevented from voting because their names had been removed or omitted from voter rolls and that poll workers and election officials were ill-prepared to help them. "Florida made all of us aware of what goes on at the street level, the need for voter registration for example," said Representative Albert R. Wynn, a Maryland Democrat who is heading a committee created by the Congressional Black Caucus to study the issue. Soft money was often used by the parties for get-out-the vote efforts, Mr. Wynn said, adding, "I'm concerned about the adverse effects on voter registration, voter mobilization." After the study group met tonight, he said it had not come to a decision and wanted to "look at some options." The Senate version of campaign finance legislation would not only ban soft money, but also raise the limits on regulated donations given by individuals to federal candidates to $2,000 per election from $1,000. Some black lawmakers say they will go along with that increase only if political action committees are allowed to give more money to candidates. Historically, minority candidates have a more difficult time competing for individual contributions, while they have drawn support from political action committees connected to labor unions, minority political organizations and liberal ideological groups. Some black and Hispanic lawmakers say they are deeply disturbed that changes in the campaign finance law are being taken up in Congress while legislation to overhaul the electoral system, like making investments in new voting machines, has languished. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/09/politics/09DONA.html?pagewanted=all

Gains Found for the Poor in Rigorous Preschool But the study also sounds an early warning about the Bush plan. The Chicago preschool program, which is operated by the public school system in 23 centers across the city, requires parents to participate in their children's homework assignments and also helps families arrange medical care and social services. In setting priorities for Head Start, the Bush administration has thus far ranked those aspects of the program � traditionally its cornerstones � below reading, much to the concern of Head Start advocates. "It's more than just providing basic literacy skills," said Arthur J. Reynolds, a professor of social work at Wisconsin, who was the lead author of the study. "You've got to put parents in classrooms, as well as kids." The study being released today tracked 989 children, all born in 1980, who enrolled in the Chicago Child Parent Center Program no later than age 4, and were taught an average of 2.5 hours a day for 18 months. Nearly all children were living at or below the poverty level, and many of the children and the parents had to be recruited and cajoled to attend by the centers' staff, who canvassed for students door to door. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/09/national/09SCHO.html?pagewanted=all

InternetNews - Web Developer News -- OASIS Begins Work on Election Markup Language If this works out, open-source fans would have a worthy achievement to cheer after the 2000 election recount debacle in Florida. The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), a non-profit XML interoperability consortium, this week put the finishing touches on a technical committee to standardize the exchange of election and voter services information using XML. Succinctly titled Election Markup Language, the standard, when hashed out by the new OASIS Election and Voter Services Technical Committee, would guide such data as voter registration and ballots safely among hardware, software and vendors. http://www.internetnews.com/wd-news/article/0,,10_759241,00.html

News Analysis: To European Eyes, It's America the Ugly Before becoming president, George W. Bush seemed acutely aware of the need for a country as powerful as the United States to show restraint. "If we are an arrogant nation, they will resent us," he said. "If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us." The words appear to have been forgotten. A torrent of hostile articles in Europe has greeted Mr. Bush's first three months in office. Their chief theme has been the arrogance of what the German weekly Der Spiegel recently called "the snarling, ugly Americans." On its Web site, the respected Munich daily S�ddeutsche Zeitung lists seven articles summing up the themes of Mr. Bush's first 100 days. They are not unrepresentative of widespread European views. The titles include: "Selling Weapons to Taiwan: Bush Throws His Weight Around in the Pacific"; "North Korea: Bush Irritates the Asians"; "World Court: No Support From United States"; "Iraq: Bombing Instead of Diplomacy"; and "Climate Agreement: The United States Abandons the Kyoto Protocol." There can be little doubt that it was irritation over those and other issues that lay behind the vote last week that ousted the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Commission for the first time, while leaving countries like Algeria and Libya as elected members. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/07/world/07EURO.html?pagewanted=all

U.S. Scientists See Big Power Savings From Conservation Their studies, completed just before the Bush administration took office, are at odds with the administration's repeated assertions in recent weeks that the nation needs to build a big new power plant every week for the next 20 years to keep up with the demand for electricity, and that big increases in production of coal and natural gas are needed to fuel those plants. A lengthy and detailed report based on three years of work by five national laboratories said that a government-led efficiency program emphasizing research and incentives to adopt new technologies could reduce the growth in electricity demand by 20 percent to 47 percent. That would be the equivalent of between 265 and 610 big 300-megawatt power plants, a steep reduction from the 1,300 new plants that the administration predicts will be needed. The range depends on how aggressively the government encourages efficiency in buildings, factories and appliances, as well as on the price of energy, which affects whether new technologies are economically attractive. Another laboratory study found that government office buildings could cut their own use of power by one-fifth at no net cost to the taxpayers by adopting widespread energy conservation measures, paying for the estimated $5 billion investment with the energy savings. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/national/06CONS.html?pagewanted=all

Punching Holes in Internet Walls On one side are the governments that have restricted Web access. In some countries, like Singapore, most of the banned sites are pornographic. Many of these countries also block the sites of political dissidents, but the censorship may be much broader than that. In the Middle East, for example, anti- Islamic sites and gay sites are often off- limits. In China, the prohibition includes the sites of Western publications, human rights organizations and Falun Gong, the banned spiritual movement. And Saudi Arabia also blocks sites for financial reasons: its ban on Internet telephony favors its own state-run telephone monopoly. Countering such government restrictions are services, some free, that are provided by companies like SafeWeb (www.safeweb.com), Anonymizer (www.anonymizer.com), SilentSurf.com (www.silentsurf.com) and the Cloak (www.the-cloak.com). During the conflict in Kosovo in 1999, for example, Anonymizer, based in San Diego, set up free services so that Kosovo residents could communicate with less fear. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/26/technology/26SAFE.html?pagewanted=all

Supreme Court Limits Scope of a Main Civil Rights Law The Supreme Court today substantially limited the effectiveness of one of the most important civil rights laws as a weapon against discrimination in the way federal grant money is used. The case before the court was a class-action lawsuit contending that the State of Alabama violated federal law by requiring applicants for drivers' licenses to take the written examination in English. Alabama, which like all states receives federal law enforcement and highway money, is the only state to limit its drivers' license exams to English. Two lower federal courts ruled that the policy had the prohibited effect of discriminating on the basis of national origin. But the Supreme Court said today that private lawsuits were not authorized under the law at issue, Title VI, which itself prohibits only intentional discrimination. The law authorizes federal agencies to issue regulations that bring their own programs into compliance with Title VI, and many regulations go beyond intentional discrimination to also bar the use of federal money in programs with discriminatory effects. The court said today that the "private right of action," the ability of private plaintiffs to go to court to enforce Title VI, extended no further than the law itself and did not apply to the regulations. The decision reflected a major battle on the court, and the hard feelings were evident in the courtroom today. In a dissenting opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens said "it makes no sense" to differentiate for the purposes of private Title VI lawsuits between intentional discrimination and discriminatory impact. "There is but one private action to enforce Title VI, and we already know that such an action exists," he said. Justice Stevens read portions of his dissent from the bench, a step justices take only rarely to call attention to developments they regard as particularly wrongheaded. He criticized the majority not only for its decision, but also for reaching out to take the case in the first place in the absence of any conflict among the lower federal courts on the issue. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/25/national/25DISC.html?pagewanted=all

Back in Texas, Bush's Legacy Comes Under Fire �George W. Bush is having an unusually tough time with the Texas Legislature. Many of the same lawmakers who passed tax cuts championed by Mr. Bush are now talking about future tax increases. Legislators in both parties agree that the state's charter schools, one of Mr. Bush's pet programs, need to be fixed. His signature environmental initiative is regarded as weak, and legislators are debating how much it should be toughened. Lawmakers also are considering easing enrollment requirements in Medicaid � a move resisted during Mr. Bush's tenure � so more poor children can be covered. And lawmakers are moving forward on several death penalty fronts, including a bill similar to one Mr. Bush vetoed two years ago that sponsors say would help provide better lawyers for indigent defendants. Just today, the Texas House of Representatives gave preliminary approval to a bill that would ban the execution of mentally retarded inmates, a measure that failed in the House two years ago after Mr. Bush spoke out against it. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/24/politics/24TEXA.html?pagewanted=all

U.S. Crew Says It Tried to Block Attack in Peru The unarmed American tracking plane � a Cessna Citation jet owned by the Air Force � was flown by a crew of three Americans under a C.I.A. contract; they were a pilot, a co-pilot and a technician, officials said. Also on board was the Peruvian officer, whose job was to direct Peru's military interceptors to suspicious planes. The tracking aircraft, one of many United States planes that are used in a longstanding program to help Peru and Colombia choke off the cocaine trade, played a crucial role in spotting the missionaries' plane and raising suspicions about its flight, according to the American officials. But they insisted that Peru's military was in command and control of drug interceptions, despite considerable support from the American military, anti-drug and intelligence agencies. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/23/world/23PLAN.html?pagewanted=all

Despite Sub Inquiry, Navy Still Sees Need for Guests on Ships Two targets of the inquiry � the Greeneville's captain and a sailor who failed to manually plot the location of the Japanese ship � have reversed their accounts on whether the presence of civilians in the control room was a factor in the crash. "In my opinion the investigation is not complete," said Eugene R. Fidell, the president of the National Institute of Military Justice, in Washington. "Never to summon 16 witnesses jammed into that control room is bizarre. "The Navy, I think, is collectively desperately concerned not to give up the distinguished visitor program," Mr. Fidell added. "They don't even want to talk about this. This is a real big deal to the Navy. To some people here, it seemed an implied threat that, if Commander Waddle were to go to a court-martial, Mr. Gittins would raise the presence of civilians as part of his defense and might produce embarrassing material about the visitor program. Commander Waddle, in his testimony � given voluntarily after he had been denied immunity � said the 16 civilians crowded into the control room did not interfere with operations. Asked twice by different admirals if the civilians were a factor in the accident, Commander Waddle each time replied, "No, sir." But last Monday, the main article on the front page of The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Mr. Gittins as saying that Commander Waddle had changed his mind and now believed that the presence of the civilians broke the crew's concentration at a crucial time. The article also noted that the visitors program "could figure prominently in the unlikely event of a court-martial and prove an embarrassment for the Navy." That same day, Time magazine published an interview with Commander Waddle that said the skipper had "reversed his previously benign view of the presence of civilians on board." Time quoted Commander Waddle as saying, "Having them in the control room at least interfered with our concentration." But Petty Officer First Class Patrick T. Seacrest changed his account in the opposite way. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/23/national/23VISI.html?pagewanted=all

U.S. Identified Baptists' Plane as Drug Carrier The United States Customs Service flies surveillance planes into what it calls the "source zone" for drugs, but a spokesman, Dennis Murphy, said today that his agency's planes were not involved in tracking the missionaries' plane on Friday. A Customs Service radar plane based in the Caribbean was flying in Colombia on Friday, but it was far north of the path taken by the Cessna 185 and did not observe it, Mr. Murphy said. The Customs Service has a P-3, a four-engine turboprop, the same kind of plane that the Navy uses to track enemy submarines, based in the Caribbean. Normal practice for the Customs Service is that once a radar plane locates a suspicious plane in flight, it radios for a Citation, a smaller plane that can fly at low speeds, to observe the target visually. Both the radar plane and the observation plane carry a representative from the host country, said Mr. Murphy, who communicates directly with the air force of the country involved. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/22/world/22PLAN.html?pagewanted=all

Opposition Builds to Spending Cuts in Bush's Budget The White House says the cuts are needed to put federal spending on a more sustainable path after several years of rapid growth. But some members of Congress from both parties have objected that the cuts are compelled mainly to pay for the large tax cuts Mr. Bush has been seeking. Mr. Bush says he can save billions of dollars by reducing "corporate subsidies," eliminating "duplicative and ineffective programs" and wiping out pork barrel projects approved at the behest of individual lawmakers. But the reality is often more complex than the White House suggests. The National Association of Children's Hospitals and the American Academy of Pediatrics have joined members of Congress trying to prevent cuts in children's programs. The administration wants to trim $35 million from a $235 million program for training doctors at children's hospitals. The National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials is fighting other proposed cuts, including one to slice $700 million from a program for construction and repair of public housing. Congress provided $3 billion for the public housing capital fund last year. Likewise, a wide range of businesses are scrambling to protect the Export-Import Bank from cuts that will be proposed by Mr. Bush. Defenders of the bank include the United States Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and exporters of all sizes. Mr. Bush is expected to propose a 24 percent reduction in the bank's budget, below the current level of $927 million. Representative Jim Kolbe, the Arizona Republican who is chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee responsible for the bank, said, "We need to be expanding, not reducing, the amount the bank gets." Mr. Bush will also propose eliminating federal subsidies for loans made under the main lending program of the Small Business Administration. He would raise fees charged to borrowers and to lenders. Mr. Bush also plans to reduce the budget for one of President Bill Clinton's favorite programs, Community Oriented Policing Services, to $855 million next year, from $1 billion this year, administration officials said. Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, said this would be a serious mistake, "a misguided retreat from our commitment to keep crime down." Mr. Bush wants to save $25 million by eliminating a disaster preparedness program known as Project Impact. He said the program, run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, "has not proved effective." Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, has won support from the Senate for her efforts to save the program, which shores up buildings to minimize damage. The project, Ms. Murray said, saved lives in the earthquake that jolted the Pacific Northwest on Feb. 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/09/politics/09BUDG.html?pagewanted=all

Fears on Privacy Law Spur Warning by Armey � to help business evade regulation and to prevent House Republicans from trying to bring new privacy bills forward. Few issues have risen to prominence as quickly as privacy. As Americans have gone online by the millions, they have become increasingly concerned over ways that their digital footprints can be traced, especially by companies that use personal data for marketing. The Federal Trade Commission recommended that Congress legislate privacy standards for Web sites, and a number of lawmakers have filed bills intended to fill in the patchwork of privacy laws on the books. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/09/technology/09PRIV.html?pagewanted=all

Focus on Farms Masks Estate Tax Confusion Harlyn Riekena worried that his success would cost him when he died. Thirty-seven years ago he quit teaching to farm and over the years bought more and more of the rich black soil here in central Iowa. Now he and his wife, Karen, own 950 gently rolling acres planted in soybeans and corn. The farmland alone is worth more than $2.5 million, and so Mr. Riekena, 61, fretted that estate taxes would take a big chunk of his three grown daughters' inheritance.

Almost no working farmers do, according to data from an Internal Revenue Service analysis of 1999 returns that has not yet been published.

That might seem a reasonable assumption, what with all the talk in Washington about the need to repeal the estate tax to save the family farm. "To keep farms in the family, we are going to get rid of the death tax," President Bush vowed a month ago; he and many others have made the point repeatedly. But in fact the Riekenas will owe nothing in estate taxes. Almost no working farmers do, according to data from an Internal Revenue Service analysis of 1999 returns that has not yet been published. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/08/business/08ESTA.html?pagewanted=all

Bush Budget on Health Care Would Cut Aid to Uninsured Budget documents from the Department of Health and Human Services show that these programs, providing "health care access for the uninsured," would be reduced 86 percent, to $20 million, from $140 million in the current fiscal year. The programs received $40 million in 2000. So far the White House has not disclosed many details of Mr. Bush's budget, which would cut taxes by $1.6 trillion over the next 10 years. But today's disclosure provides the second example of significant cuts in domestic programs. Earlier, administration officials acknowledged that the budget would include cuts in some programs for children and children's hospitals. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/04/politics/04HEAL.html?pagewanted=all

BW Online | March 15, 2001 | Coming Soon, the Smaller Business Administration President Bush's proposed budget would slash outlays to the Small Business Administration by a huge 40% -- and a good chunk of the shortfall will be borne by the SBA's clientele: small companies in need of loans. Under the Administration's plan, the SBA would get approximately $539 million next year, down from this year's $899 million. But the agency doesn't sound terribly concerned. "There are substantial savings to be found in the SBA's programs that allow us to operate with a lower appropriation, but at the same level," of services as last year, says SBA spokesman Mike Stamler. "We're on board." Why so sanguine? Some cost savings -- about $74 million worth -- can be found by eliminating programs that have been declared redundant. These include the New Markets Venture Capital Initiative, which was designed to help bring venture capital to small companies in low-income areas; BusinessLINC, a mentoring program that aims to bring together small and large companies; and Prime, a technical-assistance program for disadvantaged entrepreneurs. The big money to compensate for the budget shortfall -- $235 million -- will come from fee hikes. The 7(a) loan program will collect an additional $114.7 million by raising the guarantee fee paid by borrowers by half a percentage point on loans over $150,000. On loans for amounts between $150,000 and $700,000, borrowers will now pay a 3.5% guarantee fee, up from 3%. For larger loans, the fee goes to 4% from 3.5%. http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/mar2001/sb20010315_323.htm

Bush's Budget Would Cut 3 Programs to Aid Children President Bush intends next month to propose cuts in programs to provide child care, to prevent child abuse and to train doctors at children's hospitals, administration officials said today. State officials contend that stable child care for low-income families has been a major ingredient of successful programs to move people from welfare to work. Congress provided $2 billion last year for the Child Care and Development Block Grant. That included an increase of $817 million, or 69 percent, so that states could provide day care to 241,000 additional children. Budget documents from the Department of Health and Human Services show that Mr. Bush plans to cut child care grants by $200 million, to $1.8 billion, as part of the budget he will send Congress early next month. The documents also show that spending for programs dealing with child abuse would be reduced by $15.7 million, or 18 percent. That would leave $71.8 million for federal grants to the states to prevent and investigate child abuse and neglect. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/23/politics/23SPEN.html?pagewanted=all

News Analysis: Bush Faces Quandaries of Economy and Energy Under the proposal he sent to Congress just a few weeks ago, there was no tax cut for the current year at all, a fact that seemed to undercut the president's repeated claim that the combination of the Fed's rate cuts and his own tax plan would pull the country out of what appears to be a cyclical downturn. Even the cut passed by the House earlier this month � and heartily endorsed by the White House � provides only $5.6 billion in tax relief this year. In a $10 trillion economy, that is, in the words of Robert Litan, an economist at the Brookings Institution, "something so tiny that you won't even notice it." On that point, Democrats and Republicans seem to agree. But each side is using that fact to bolster the case for substantial change in Mr. Bush's plan. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/21/politics/21ASSE.html?pagewanted=all

Washington Memo: For Bush, a Chronicle of Bad News Foretold Normally, presidents are cheerleaders for the nation's economy. On Oct. 19, 1987, the day the Dow Jones industrial average dropped 508 points, or 22.6 percent, President Ronald Reagan said the historic fall was simply investors taking profits. The next day, he blamed Democrats in Congress. The day after that, Mr. Reagan proclaimed that the crisis "appears to be over." In 1991, when the economy was last in a recession, President George Bush told Congress in his State of the Union address that there were "reasons to be optimistic about our economy." He predicted, accurately, that "we will get on our way to a new record of expansion and achieve the competitive strength that will carry us into the next American century." For President Bill Clinton, touting the economy posed no problem, since he presided over a period of unremittingly good economic news. Now comes George W. Bush, who is presenting what an analysis in The Financial Times last week called "the novel spectacle" of a president "urging citizens to ignore good economic news and focus on the bad." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/19/politics/19MEMO.html?pagewanted=all

A Bill to Wall Off Medicare Revenue Fails In a preview of what is likely to be a recurring budget battle this year, the Senate today blocked an attempt by Democrats to restrict Congress's use of surplus Medicare revenues for a tax cut or general government spending. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/14/politics/14MEDI.html?pagewanted=all

Political Memo: Resurrecting Ghosts of Pardons Past His testimony revealed little about how Mr. Rich won his pardon, and Republicans had worked behind the scenes to spare him from appearing at all. But by calling him, Representative Henry A. Waxman, the committee's ranking Democrat, sought to make a point: Mr. Clinton may have been irresponsible in issuing his final sheaf of pardons, but Republicans do not have completely clean hands on the issue. During the hearing, Mr. Waxman cited the case of Orlando Borsch, suspected of being a terrorist from Cuba, who was released from jail in 1990 by the administration of former President George Bush. Jeb Bush, the former president's son who is now the governor of Florida, had lobbied for Mr. Borsch's release, which had become a cause c�l�bre among Cuban-Americans in South Florida. The Borsch case was not the only one that Mr. Waxman raised as he sought to turn the tables on Republican investigators in what has become the Democrats' tried-and-true technique for trying to trip up the many inquiries started by Mr. Burton, Republican of Indiana. Mr. Waxman said he found the pardon of Armand Hammer just as suspicious as that of Mr. Rich. In 1989, former President Bush pardoned Mr. Hammer, the former head of Occidental Petroleum who had pleaded guilty to making illegal campaign contributions. Mr. Hammer was a major donor to Republicans. Shortly before he received the pardon, he gave more than $100,000 to the Republican Party and $100,000 to the Bush-Quayle Inaugural Committee. "The appearance of a quid pro quo is just as strong in the Hammer case as in the Rich case, if not stronger, since Mr. Hammer himself gave the contribution," Mr. Waxman said. In the case of Mr. Rich, it was his former wife, Denise, who was both a pardon advocate and major donor � she gave $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library. Mr. Waxman called on Mr. Burton to subpoena the library records of the Republican administrations to look into potential abuses. Mr. Burton did not take him up on his offer. "I was turned down," Mr. Waxman said. "It seems we can pursue President Clinton's library, but not President Bush's or President Reagan's." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/04/politics/04MEMO.html?pagewanted=allt

Doing the Math on Bush's Tax Cut In all of Washington, there are three computer models built to produce what are called distributional tables � showing how any particular tax increase or tax cut would be distributed among various income levels. One model is at the Treasury Department, one is at Congress's Joint Tax Committee and one is at Citizens for Tax Justice, a research institute sponsored by labor unions. The methods are slightly different. But in the end, the analyses differ only at the margins. In the past, Democrats ran either the Treasury Department or the Joint Tax Committee � depending on which party controlled the White House and which controlled Congress � and whenever a tax proposal was made, the computer the Democrats were in charge of would instantly produce a distributional table. But Republicans have never liked that kind of measurement, saying it contributed to class warfare. So this year, with Republicans in charge of the White House and both houses of Congress for the first time in almost 50 years, neither the Treasury nor Congress has provided distributional tables on President Bush's tax plan. � Tax analysts from both parties who have worked at the Congressional Joint Tax Committee and the Office of Tax Analysis in the Treasury say the relevant information on how the Bush plan would affect people with different incomes is already in the computers. All it would take to produce the distributional tables would be for someone to push a button, the analysts said. But that may not happen. At a press briefing on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill said that figuring out what the tax benefits of the president plan would be at various income levels resulted only in "a nonsense set of statistics." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/04/politics/04CONG.html?pagewanted=all

Doing the Math on Bush's Tax Cut If the entire plan becomes law, the richest 1 percent of taxpayers would get between 22 percent and 45 percent of the tax benefits, depending on how the calculations are done. These are the 1.3 million taxpayers with annual incomes of more than about $370,000. Because some of them are fabulously wealthy, the average income of these taxpayers is more than $1 million. The poorest 60 percent of taxpayers, those with incomes below $44,000, would receive less than 13 percent of the money from lower taxes in the Bush proposals. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/04/politics/04CONG.html?pagewanted=all

Chicago Tribune | News - Columnists - Clarence Page Yet there he was portraying himself as the crusading victim as he gave his pep talk to the right-wing's troops. "Today, no one can honestly be surprised by the venomous attacks" unleashed on anyone who strays from the conventional wisdom, Thomas said. Right. Republicans control both houses of Congress and the White House--helped along, as I recall, by a fortuitous Supreme Court decision in which Thomas helped end the recount of Florida's presidential votes. Thomas had Vice President Dick Cheney and several Cabinet members sitting in the audience while he spun his tale of woe and delivered his defiant closing to robust applause: "Be not afraid!" Afraid? Excuse me? Afraid of what? Too much power?� Echoes of his speech have come to mind as I have been reading a book that has critics of America's civil rights leadership all abuzz this season. It is called "Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America," by John H. McWhorter, a black associate professor of linguistics at the University of California at Berkeley. It's the best among the latest of what I call "black self-flagellation" books. Since at least 1990, when Shelby Steele's seminal "Content of Our Character: A New Vision of Race in America" came out, it seems that no black writer has gone broke by portraying black people as our own worst enemy. Quite the opposite, one can win instant fame, high-priced speaking engagements, warm praise from conservative talk-show hosts and perhaps even a lucrative fellowship or two. (The same is true, by the way, of many so-called "post-feminist" books that describe feminism as a betrayal of women, but that's a topic for another day.) http://chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/page/0,1122,SAV-0103040059,00.html

News Analysis: Surplus Feast - Will Tax-Cut Appetizer Leave Room for Debt-Slice Dessert? But very little in Washington is exactly what it seems, and this is no exception. Paying down the debt and "saving Social Security first" became, in the Clinton years, Democratic ideas, which Mr. Bush is now paying homage to in an effort to win over Democrats and secure quick passage of his tax cut. The details released today, however, suggest something a bit more subtle. Mr. Bush has now redefined the national debt, so that it looks more manageable. And Mr. Bush's aides are arguing that it does not need to be paid off so fast � which, conveniently, leaves them a bit more room for their own favorite programs, like a national missile defense, new spending on education and creating private Social Security accounts. All of this raises two questions: Which party is pursuing the more conservative course? And what does it say about the ideology of George W. Bush, whose "compassionate conservatism" seemed at times an effort to dress up the philosophy of Ronald Reagan in the moderate poll- tested oratory of Bill Clinton? http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/01/politics/01ASSE.html?pagewanted=all

Civil Works and Loans Targeted in Bush Plan President Bush's budget includes proposals to cut hundreds of millions of dollars for rural development, loan guarantees for small businesses, research on advanced technology, public housing and construction of the international space station. The cuts would affect programs at the Departments of Commerce, Agriculture, Energy and Transportation, as well as the Small Business Administration. In addition, Mr. Bush's budget shows that he wants to slow the growth of Medicare, slicing about 5 percent from the amounts that would be spent under current law in the coming decade. He did not say how he would achieve those savings, other than to promise that he would "modernize and reform Medicare," the health insurance program for 39 million people who are elderly or disabled. While Mr. Bush did propose a substantial increase in spending for the Education Department, Democrats said it was a much smaller increase than Congress approved for the current year. By the administration's reckoning, the department's budget would rise 11.5 percent, to $44.5 billion in 2002, compared with an increase of 35.7 percent this year. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/01/politics/01CUTS.html?pagewanted=all

Panel Calls for Reparations in Tulsa Race Riot "They came in the house with torches, and my mother hid us four wee children under the bed," Mr. Monroe said. "They set the curtains on fire and, as one guy was leaving, he stepped on my fingers. My little sister slapped her hand over my mouth to keep me from screaming out." "That's what I remember most, my little sister's hand slapped over my mouth." And as Mr. Monroe, now 84, watched the Oklahoma Commission to Study the Tulsa Race Riots of 1921 deliver its final report at a news conference today � recommending that reparations be paid to survivors and their descendants � he was feeling stifled once again. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/01/national/01TULS.html?pagewanted=all

News Analysis: Bush Makes a Narrow Focus on a Few Signature Issues While Mr. Bush in his speech tonight talked about issues like rebuilding the military, encouraging charitable contributions and fighting rising energy prices and racial profiling, he stopped short of offering an array of new programs and mini- initiatives. He talked of a government that was "active but limited." Much the same could have been said of his speech. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/28/politics/28ASSE.html?pagewanted=all

What's His Pledge Really Worth

Bush Underlines Pledge About Social Security But, as Al Gore repeatedly pointed out during the campaign, Mr. Bush presented his plan as all gain and nopain, sidestepping the debate over whether restoring Social Security's health would require steps like cutting the guaranteed benefit, reducing cost of living increases for beneficiaries or raising the retirement age. Mr. Bush also remained quiet during the campaign, and again tonight, on how the government would pay for the creation of the private accounts. Analysts put the cost at $1 trillion over the next decade. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/28/politics/28POLI.html?pagewanted=all

But Yesterday, Before the Speech

The administration's budget anticipates paying down $2 trillion in public debt that matures no later than 2011 out of the part of the projected surplus coming from Social Security � about $2.5 trillion out of the total surplus of $5.6 trillion. The debt held by the public excludes $2.5 trillion the government owes to itself, largely in the form of promises to pay future Social Security benefits. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/27/politics/27BUDG.html?pagewanted=all

Wealthiest Pay Declining Share of Their Incomes in Taxes The richest Americans are paying a declining share of their incomes in taxes, even as their incomes grow more rapidly than everyone else's, according to data that the Internal Revenue Service gave a Republican member of Congress. The 1998 incomes, after taxes, of the top 1 percent of taxpayers increased at more than three times the rate of the bottom 90 percent, according to an analysis of this data by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonprofit research organization in Washington that seeks to advance the interests of the poor. Over a longer period, from 1989 to 1998, the incomes of the richest 1 percent, adjusted for inflation, grew about eight times as fast. But the share of their income they paid in federal taxes in 1998 was at its lowest level since 1992, the year before Congress added two higher tax brackets that apply only to top earners. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/26/business/26RICH.html?pagewanted=all

Millions Eligible for Food Stamps Aren't Applying "There is no reason that any American in 2001 should go hungry," said Senator Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana, who is chairman of the Agriculture Committee. "States should do everything possible to make certain that those who qualify for food stamps know it and are enrolled if they so choose. That was the intent of the law." Yet that has not happened in most states. Despite studies warning that bureaucratic hurdles discourage the poor from applying for food stamps, states have been wary of streamlining their application processes. A major reason, some critics say, is that states fear they will be penalized by the federal government for giving recipients too much in food stamps � or too little. In 1996, Arizona was fined $21 million because of the high number of errors its social workers made in calculating the size of benefits. Those complicated calculations are based on mandates drawn up by the Agriculture Department to deter fraud. But as a result, many states require the poor to fill out long applications and visit welfare offices every three months to make sure the benefits are correct. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/26/national/26FOOD.html?pagewanted=all

Interest Groups Are Gearing Up for High-Stakes Tax Cut Fight The organizing goes far beyond the old-fashioned "Gucci Gulch" lobbying for particular corporate tax breaks, and is drawing groups as far- flung as the Food Marketing Institute and the N.A.A.C.P. into the tax cut debate. The Congressional struggle could well turn into the kind of epic fight for public opinion that took place over President Bill Clinton's proposal for national health insurance. "This is the first test," said Grover Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, one of the conservative groups joining the fray. "If Bush gets his $1.6 trillion, two things happen � his stature and power in town is greatly enhanced and it makes the rest of his agenda more likely to pass." Promising field operations against the tax cut all across the country, Ralph G. Neas, of the liberal People for the American Way, said that in swaying Congress, "the most important thing is having the voters outside of Washington � the people who vote � register the opposition to the tax cut." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/24/politics/24LOBB.html?pagewanted=all

Federal Panel Warns Bush of Social Security Problems Beneficiaries must wait two to four hours for assistance at many field offices and often cannot obtain accurate information by telephone, the panel said. Social Security's disability programs, which provide assistance to 10 million people at a cost of $90 billion a year, are in chaos, swamped with a backlog of claims and litigation, the panel said. Eligibility decisions are not made in a uniform or consistent manner, the panel said, and two-thirds of the people who challenge the denial of disability benefits prevail on appeal, overturning the initial decisions of the Social Security Administration. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/19/politics/19BENE.html?pagewanted=all

Malcolm X Conference Audio proceedings of the conference Malcolm X: Radical Tradition and Legacy of Struggle May 1990, Borough of Manhattan Community College, New York City http://www.murchisoncenter.org/malcolm/

Under orders from Congress, the I.R.S. is giving particular attention to returns filed by the working poor�

Rate of All I.R.S. Audits Falls; Poor Face Intense Scrutiny The chance of an individual tax return's being audited last year was less than one in 200, down from one in 112 in 1999 and one in 60 in 1996, new data and revised figures for last year show. Even those figures significantly overstate the risk of an audit for most taxpayers. That is because, under orders from Congress, the I.R.S. is giving particular attention to returns filed by the working poor who apply for a special tax credit. Such returns accounted for 44 percent of all audits. Among taxpayers who did not apply for that credit, the audit rate last year was just one in 370. For taxpayers who make more than $100,000, and who pay 62 percent of all individual income taxes, the audit rate last year was slightly less than one in 100, down from one in 50 in 1998 and down from one in 9 in 1988. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/16/business/16AUDI.html?pagewanted=ally

Dozens of Rich Americans Join in Fight to Retain the Estate Tax Some 120 wealthy Americans, including Warren E. Buffett, George Soros and the father of William H. Gates, are urging Congress not to repeal taxes on estates and gifts. President Bush has proposed phasing out those taxes by 2009. But a petition drive being organized here by Mr. Gates's father, William H. Gates Sr., argues that "repealing the estate tax would enrich the heirs of America's millionaires and billionaires while hurting families who struggle to make ends meet." The billions of dollars in government revenue lost "will inevitably be made up either by increasing taxes on those less able to pay or by cutting Social Security, Medicare, environmental protection and many other government programs so important to our nation's continued well-being," the petition says. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/14/politics/14ESTA.html?pagewanted=all

Medical Industry Lobbies to Rein In New Patients Privacy Rules Just weeks before far-reaching new rules to protect the privacy of people's medical records go into force, the health care industry is lobbying the Bush administration to delay, change or kill the regulations. Hospitals, insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and medical researchers said the rules, issued in the final weeks of the Clinton administration, would impose costly burdens. But members of Congress said the privacy protections, while they went further than many lawmakers expected when Congress asked to have them written, were immensely popular with consumers and would be hard to reverse at this point. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/12/politics/12PRIV.html?pagewanted=all

Some Fault Bush Tax Cuts for Lean Days in Texas While President Bush is lobbying Congress to pass his $1.6 trillion tax cut proposal in Washington, lawmakers in his home state are struggling with budget problems that some critics are tracing to tax cuts Mr. Bush passed here as governor. For the last week, state legislators have grown increasingly testy about budget projections showing that the state will have little, if any, money to spare. Lawmakers in both parties are talking of possible cutbacks after the projections showed that the state's once-healthy surplus might be nearly erased by budget overruns, particularly from health care costs like Medicaid. "There's no doubt in my mind that George W. Bush's tax cuts have put us in the situation we're in right now," said State Senator Mario Gallegos, a Houston Democrat who regularly criticized Mr. Bush in the presidential campaign. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/12/politics/12TEXA.html?pagewanted=all

Census Officials Ponder Adjustments Crucial to Redistricting Census officials have been tight- lipped about what the panel will recommend, though some experts have said they expect it to find that the net undercount in 2000 will be smaller than in 1990, when it was put at about 1.6 percent of the population. The experts suggested that fewer members of minorities, especially Hispanics and to a lesser extent blacks, were missed in 2000 than in 1990. But both of these trends may be overshadowed by a larger than expected number of people � mainly whites � who were counted twice. Census officials have been concerned for some time that last year's census may include a large overcount, perhaps even bigger than the more than four million people who were counted twice in 1990. Those who are counted twice tend to be children of divorced parents, college students living away from home whose parents list them on census forms and who also fill out census questionnaires on campus, and people with two homes who have received census forms in the mail at both of their dwellings. http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/12/politics/12CENS.html?pagewanted=all